Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Phoenix Weir vs James Mackinlay Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Weir vs Mackinlay analysis and find out who is favored!
Phoenix Weir vs James Mackinlay Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Weir 2 - 0 Mackinlay
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Weir has won 52.8% of points on their second serve, while Mackinlay has won 48.15%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Weir, in recent form, has won 52.29% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mackinlay has won 48.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.75% and 27.27% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Weir has saved 62.64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mackinlay has saved 25% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Weir has won 52.5% of matches played (W/L 21/ 19), with Mackinlay winning 53.33% (W/L 8/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Weir has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 16/ 10), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Mackinlay has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Weir has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.5% of matches (W/L 21/ 19), where as Mackinlay has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.33% of matches (W/L 8/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Weir winning 2 times and Mackinlay being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Weir winning 4 and Mackinlay winning 0. The last match between Weir and Mackinlay was at the M25 Glasgow, 23-10-2023, Q3, I.hard with Phoenix Weir getting the victory 7-5 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:57:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Weir and Mackinlay have played a deciding set 0 times, with Weir winning 0 times and Mackinlay 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Weir winning 2, and Mackinlay 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Weir has played against opponents with an average rank of 56.85 while Mackinlay has played against players with an average rank of 58.53.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Weir has won 27% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mackinlay has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Weir has converted 42.57% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mackinlay has converted 28.57% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
2
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
49% (26-27)
Career Total W/L
35% (13-24)
50% (8-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Phoenix Weir vs James Mackinlay For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Weir VS Mackinlay
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Phoenix Weir | James Mackinlay |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 27 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 17 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:0 | 1:57:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (110/173) | 58% (88/153) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (73/110) | 65% (57/88) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (36/63) | 38% (25/65) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (8/18) | 24% (4/17) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (71/153) | 37% (64/173) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-0 |
Stats 
Phoenix Weir
Player
James Mackinlay
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| 7-6(6) 7-6(4) |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
James Mackinlay
65%
(
74 of
113)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
45 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Phoenix Weir | James Mackinlay |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (8/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (20/19) | 20% (1/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (222/202) | 38% (21/34) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.37 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 76 | 8 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.11 |
| DFs Total | 31 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:18 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 44.56 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (639/1067) | 59% (39/66) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (449/639) | 69% (27/39) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (226/428) | 48% (13/27) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (43/101) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (408/1037) | 36% (27/75) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (8/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (8/16) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (2/0) |
Phoenix Weir Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Michael Shaw
Player
Phoenix Weir
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
Matthew Hulme
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Delicata
Player
Phoenix Weir
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 7-5 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stijn Pel
Player
Phoenix Weir
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Phoenix Weir
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
Nicolas Colne
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-7(6) 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
Cezar Mihai Lupean
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
9%
(
3 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
51
Total Points Won
12
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanis Ghazouani Durand
Player
Phoenix Weir
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
Fabien Salle
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-0 6-7(3) 10-6 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
Ryan James Storrie
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
James Mackinlay Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-0 5-7 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
James Mackinlay
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
James Mackinlay
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
26 of
38)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Mackinlay
Player
Siim Troost
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
5-7 6-4 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Mackinlay
Player
David Stevenson
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
6
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
5
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
39 of
48)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
24 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
23 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(5) 6-7(4) 10-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
James Mackinlay
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Mackinlay
Player
Ioannis Stamatopoulos
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
James Mackinlay
65%
(
74 of
113)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
45 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Mackinlay
Player
Francesco Paschetto
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
11
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martim Simoes
Player
James Mackinlay
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Weir Vs Mackinlay Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Weir are available here and Mackinlay photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
